Comparison of the diagnostic yield of aCGH and genome-wide sequencing across different neurodevelopmental disorders.

Most consensus recommendations for the genetic diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) do not include the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) and are still based on chromosomal microarrays, such as comparative genomic hybridization array (aCGH). This study compares the diagnostic yield obtained by aCGH and clinical exome sequencing in NDD globally and its spectrum of disorders. To that end, 1412 patients clinically diagnosed with NDDs and studied with aCGH were classified into phenotype categories: global developmental delay/intellectual disability (GDD/ID); autism spectrum disorder (ASD); and other NDDs. These categories were further subclassified based on the most frequent accompanying signs and symptoms into isolated forms, forms with epilepsy; forms with micro/macrocephaly and syndromic forms. Two hundred and forty-five patients of the 1412 were subjected to clinical exome sequencing. Diagnostic yield of aCGH and clinical exome sequencing, expressed as the number of solved cases, was compared for each phenotype category and subcategory. Clinical exome sequencing was superior than aCGH for all cases except for isolated ASD, with no additional cases solved by NGS. Globally, clinical exome sequencing solved 20% of cases (versus 5.7% by aCGH) and the diagnostic yield was highest for all forms of GDD/ID and lowest for Other NDDs (7.1% versus 1.4% by aCGH) and ASD (6.1% versus 3% by aCGH). In the majority of cases, diagnostic yield was higher in the phenotype subcategories than in the mother category. These results suggest that NGS could be used as a first-tier test in the diagnostic algorithm of all NDDs followed by aCGH when necessary.

Prioritizing variants of uncertain significance for reclassification using a rule-based algorithm in inherited retinal dystrophies.

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) are a highly heterogeneous group of rare diseases with a molecular diagnostic rate of >50%. Reclassification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) poses a challenge for IRD diagnosis. We collected 668 IRD cases analyzed by our geneticists using two different clinical exome-sequencing tests. We identified 114 unsolved cases pending reclassification of 125 VUS and studied their genomic, functional, and laboratory-specific features, comparing them to pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants from the same cohort (N = 390). While the clinical exome used did not show differences in diagnostic rate, the more IRD-experienced geneticist reported more VUS (p = 4.07e-04). Significantly fewer VUS were reported in recessive cases (p = 2.14e-04) compared to other inheritance patterns, and of all the genes analyzed, ABCA4 and IMPG2 had the lowest and highest VUS frequencies, respectively (p = 3.89e-04, p = 6.93e-03). Moreover, few frameshift and stop-gain variants were found to be informed VUS (p = 6.73e-08 and p = 2.93e-06). Last, we applied five pathogenicity predictors and found there is a significant proof of deleteriousness when all score for pathogenicity in missense variants. Altogether, these results provided input for a set of rules that correctly reclassified ~70% of VUS as pathogenic in validation datasets. Disease- and setting-specific features influence VUS reporting. Comparison with pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants can prioritize VUS more likely to be reclassified as causal.

Novel PXDN biallelic variants in patients with microphthalmia and anterior segment dysgenesis.

Microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and anterior segment dysgenesis are severe ocular developmental defects. There is a wide genetic heterogeneity leading to these ocular malformations. By using whole genome, exome and targeted sequencing in patients with ocular developmental anomalies, six biallelic pathogenic variants (including five novel variants) were identified in the PXDN gene in four families with microphthalmia and anterior segment dysgenesis. Only 11 different mutations (11 families) have been described in this gene to date. The phenotype of these patients is variable in severity, ranging from cataract and developmental glaucoma to complex microphthalmia. Interestingly, two unrelated patients of our series presented with an ocular phenotype including aniridia and microspherophakia. However, despite various phenotypic presentations and types of mutations, no genotype-phenotype correlation could be made. Thus, this work improves our knowledge of the recessive phenotype associated with biallelic variants in this gene and highlights the importance of screening PXDN in patients with anterior segment dysgenesis with or without microphthalmia.

Expanded Phenotypic Spectrum of Retinopathies Associated with Autosomal Recessive and Dominant Mutations in PROM1.

PURPOSE: To describe the genetic and phenotypic characteristics of a cohort of patients with PROM1 variants. DESIGN: Case-case study. METHODS: We screened a cohort of 2216 families with inherited retinal dystrophies using classical molecular techniques and next-generation sequencing approaches. The clinical histories of 25 patients were reviewed to determine age of onset of symptoms and the results of ophthalmoscopy, best-corrected visual acuity, full-field electroretinography, and visual field studies. Fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography were further assessed in 7 patients. RESULTS: PROM1 variants were identified in 32 families. Disease-causing variants were found in 18 autosomal recessive and 4 autosomal dominant families. Monoallelic pathogenic variants or variants of unknown significance were identified in the remaining 10 families. Comprehensive phenotyping of 25 patients from 22 families carrying likely disease-causing variants revealed clinical heterogeneity associated with the PROM1 gene. Most of these patients presented cone-rod dystrophy and some exhibited macular dystrophy or retinitis pigmentosa, while all presented with macular damage. Phenotypic association of a dominant splicing variant with late-onset mild maculopathy was established. This variant is one of the 3 likely founder variants identified in our Spanish cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest cohort of patients with PROM1 variants, describing in detail the phenotype in 25 of them. Interestingly, within the variability of phenotypes related to this gene, macular involvement is a common feature in all patients.

Genomic Landscape of Sporadic Retinitis Pigmentosa: Findings from 877 Spanish Cases.

PURPOSE: We aimed to unravel the molecular basis of sporadic retinitis pigmentosa (sRP) in the largest cohort reported to date. DESIGN: Case series. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 877 unrelated Spanish sporadic cases with a clinical diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and negative family history. METHODS: The cohort was studied by classic genotyping or targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and array-based comparative genomic hybridization were performed to confirm copy number variations detected by NGS. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction was assessed in sRP cases carrying de novo variants to confirm paternity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study of the sRP cohort showed a high proportion of causal autosomal dominant (AD) and X-linked (XL) variants, most of them being de novo. RESULTS: Causative variants were identified in 38% of the patients studied, segregating recessively in 84.5% of the solved cases. Biallelic variants detected in only 6 different autosomal recessive genes explained 50% of the cases characterized. Causal AD and XL variants were found in 7.6% and 7.9% of cases, respectively. Remarkably, 20 de novo variants were confirmed after trio analysis, explaining 6% of the cases. In addition, 17% of the solved sRP cases were reclassified to a different retinopathy phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the clinical utility of NGS testing for sRP cases, expands the mutational spectrum, and provides accurate prevalence of mutated genes. Our findings evidence the underestimated role of de novo variants in the etiology of RP, emphasizing the importance of segregation analysis as well as comprehensive screening of genes carrying XL and AD variants in sporadic cases. Such in-depth study is essential for accurate family counseling and future enrollment in gene therapy-based treatments.

Toward the Mutational Landscape of Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Comprehensive Analysis of 258 Spanish Families.

Purpose: To provide a comprehensive overview of the molecular basis of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) in Spanish families. Thus, we established the molecular characterization rate, gene prevalence, and mutational spectrum in the largest European cohort reported to date. Methods: A total of 258 unrelated Spanish families with a clinical diagnosis of RP and suspected autosomal dominant inheritance were included. Clinical diagnosis was based on complete ophthalmologic examination and family history. Retrospective and prospective analysis of Spanish adRP families was carried out using a combined strategy consisting of classic genetic techniques and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for single-nucleotide variants and copy number variation (CNV) screening. Results: Overall, 60% of our families were genetically solved. Interestingly, 3.1% of the cohort carried pathogenic CNVs. Disease-causing variants were found in an autosomal dominant gene in 55% of the families; however, X-linked and autosomal recessive forms were also identified in 3% and 2%, respectively. Four genes (RHO, PRPF31, RP1, and PRPH2) explained up to 62% of the solved families. Missense changes were most frequently found in adRP-associated genes; however, CNVs represented a relevant disease cause in PRPF31- and CRX-associated forms. Conclusions: Implementation of NGS technologies in the adRP study clearly increased the diagnostic yield compared with classic approaches. Our study outcome expands the spectrum of disease-causing variants, provides accurate data on mutation gene prevalence, and highlights the implication of CNVs as important contributors to adRP etiology.